Skip to content

Correct an internal link in IoC page #7293

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 11, 2025
Merged

Conversation

liamlaverty
Copy link
Contributor

📋 Description

Updates an internal link in https://docs.umbraco.com/umbraco-cms/reference/using-ioc .

Before:
https://docs.umbraco.com/umbraco-cms/reference/using-ioc#registering-dependencies-in-the-programcs-file

After:
https://docs.umbraco.com/umbraco-cms/reference/using-ioc#registering-dependencies-in-the-program.cs-file

📎 Related Issues (if applicable)

N/A

✅ Contributor Checklist

I've followed the Umbraco Documentation Style Guide and can confirm that:

  • [ ✅ ] Code blocks are correctly formatted.
  • [ ✅ ] Sentences are short and clear (preferably under 25 words).
  • [ ✅ ] Passive voice and first-person language (“we”, “I”) are avoided.
  • [ ✅ ] Relevant pages are linked.
  • [ ✅ ] All links work and point to the correct resources.
  • [ ✅ ] Screenshots or diagrams are included if useful.
  • [ ✅ ] Any code examples or instructions have been tested.
  • [ ✅ ] Typos, broken links, and broken images are fixed.

Product & Version (if relevant)

13, 14, 15, 16

Deadline (if relevant)

N/A

📚 Helpful Resources

Copy link
Contributor

@sofietoft sofietoft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!
Thanks for the PR @liamlaverty ! 🙌

@sofietoft sofietoft merged commit 5488bc6 into umbraco:main Aug 11, 2025
7 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants